Article – Food Sovereignty: Rights as instruments in Argentina’s Constitution

Abstract: This article analyzes how certain rights enshrined in Argentina’s Constitution may play a role in supporting the implementation of Food Sovereignty in a national space. First, the article describes the main elements of Food Sovereignty and the ambiguous situation of law in the movement. After describing Argentina’s constitutional system, with special reference to social rights, the article links every main element of Food Sovereignty with one or more constitutional rights that could serve as a defense against policies detrimental to Food Sovereignty or as an instrument to promote or protect the implementation of this new food system.

Brazil/Article – Food Sovereignty and Security in Latin America: A Look at Legal and Conceptual Frameworks

The concepts of Food Security and Sovereignty are marked by different meanings and strategies for their implementation, including controversial components. In Latin America, there are numerous challenges to achieving Food and Nutrition Security (FNS) and so, achieving Food Sovereignty. Considering the relevance of the creation of regulatory frameworks in such countries, and the significance of regional articulation to overcome these challenges, the aim of this article is to both, identify and describe the legal and conceptual frameworks on Sovereignty and FNS, in Latin America. This study has been developed through a qualitative approach. Google has been used as a search tool for the national regulatory frameworks, by combining different keywords. It has been noted that, in the region, the existence of legislation on FNS is a key factor, where 32 out of the 33 autonomous Latin American countries have set national regulatory frameworks, or action plans to deal with FNS. As for the concepts of FNS, Food Sovereignty, and Food Systems, they appear prominently in the legislation of the region, including Food Insecurity (FI). Finally, the identification of multiple perspectives on the subject in the region should be acknowledged as a strength that shelters the diversity of expressions of resistance and cultural resilience of traditional food systems, and not as a barrier to the construction of cooperation initiatives.